<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Migne&#8217;s Patrologia Graeca in Logos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://philgons.com/2007/12/mignes-patrologia-graeca-in-logos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://philgons.com/2007/12/mignes-patrologia-graeca-in-logos/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Theology and Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:33:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Gons</title>
		<link>http://philgons.com/2007/12/mignes-patrologia-graeca-in-logos/comment-page-1/#comment-8190</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Gons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 04:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philgons.com/2007/12/mignes-patrologia-graeca-in-logos/#comment-8190</guid>
		<description>Jim, I do enjoy working at Logos. Thanks for asking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim, I do enjoy working at Logos. Thanks for asking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Gons</title>
		<link>http://philgons.com/2007/12/mignes-patrologia-graeca-in-logos/comment-page-1/#comment-8189</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Gons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 04:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philgons.com/2007/12/mignes-patrologia-graeca-in-logos/#comment-8189</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Mark.

As to the newsgroup vs. forum issue, there seems to be two very diverse opinions. Unfortunately for the forum lovers, Bob is currently on the other side. This came out in a recent post in the newsgroups. Feel free to email suggest@logos.com and voice your opinion. If you know of an easy way to go the both–and route, please let us know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Mark.</p>
<p>As to the newsgroup vs. forum issue, there seems to be two very diverse opinions. Unfortunately for the forum lovers, Bob is currently on the other side. This came out in a recent post in the newsgroups. Feel free to email <a href="mailto:suggest@logos.com">suggest@logos.com</a> and voice your opinion. If you know of an easy way to go the both–and route, please let us know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Barnes</title>
		<link>http://philgons.com/2007/12/mignes-patrologia-graeca-in-logos/comment-page-1/#comment-7526</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Barnes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 11:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philgons.com/2007/12/mignes-patrologia-graeca-in-logos/#comment-7526</guid>
		<description>Phil,

I might well buy this, but it would obviously depend on costs. I seem to remember ICC debuted at $1,000 on pre-pub, so if this was $5,000, that would not be an option.

But can I also add another plea. I consider myself a pretty advanced computer user, but I just never read the Logos Newsgroups. Newsgroups were great when I was starting out online in the early nineties. But now?

To fire up a Usenet reader just to read the Logos newsgroup, and have to download every message before I can search, and not have proper access to an archive unless I spend hours downloading is just a real pain. Moreover, I can&#039;t access the groups from my pocket PC. Like most users, I want to be able to participate from my web-browser, or read through my RSS reader.

Please, please, please, can we migrate the newsgroups to online forums, or at least mirror them online. I suspect the vast majority of Logos users don&#039;t participate in these groups because it&#039;s simply too much trouble.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil,</p>
<p>I might well buy this, but it would obviously depend on costs. I seem to remember ICC debuted at $1,000 on pre-pub, so if this was $5,000, that would not be an option.</p>
<p>But can I also add another plea. I consider myself a pretty advanced computer user, but I just never read the Logos Newsgroups. Newsgroups were great when I was starting out online in the early nineties. But now?</p>
<p>To fire up a Usenet reader just to read the Logos newsgroup, and have to download every message before I can search, and not have proper access to an archive unless I spend hours downloading is just a real pain. Moreover, I can&#8217;t access the groups from my pocket PC. Like most users, I want to be able to participate from my web-browser, or read through my RSS reader.</p>
<p>Please, please, please, can we migrate the newsgroups to online forums, or at least mirror them online. I suspect the vast majority of Logos users don&#8217;t participate in these groups because it&#8217;s simply too much trouble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim thompson</title>
		<link>http://philgons.com/2007/12/mignes-patrologia-graeca-in-logos/comment-page-1/#comment-6840</link>
		<dc:creator>jim thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 05:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philgons.com/2007/12/mignes-patrologia-graeca-in-logos/#comment-6840</guid>
		<description>u enjoy working at Logos?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>u enjoy working at Logos?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How much would you pay for Migne&#8217;s Patrologia Graeca? &#171; Epistles of Thomas</title>
		<link>http://philgons.com/2007/12/mignes-patrologia-graeca-in-logos/comment-page-1/#comment-6622</link>
		<dc:creator>How much would you pay for Migne&#8217;s Patrologia Graeca? &#171; Epistles of Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 05:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philgons.com/2007/12/mignes-patrologia-graeca-in-logos/#comment-6622</guid>
		<description>[...] 12/12/07 Yesterday Phil Gons expressed his hopes that, if Patrologia Graeca is successful, Logos would also eventually do Patrologia Latina and then Patrologia Orientalis. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 12/12/07 Yesterday Phil Gons expressed his hopes that, if Patrologia Graeca is successful, Logos would also eventually do Patrologia Latina and then Patrologia Orientalis. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike aubrey</title>
		<link>http://philgons.com/2007/12/mignes-patrologia-graeca-in-logos/comment-page-1/#comment-6597</link>
		<dc:creator>mike aubrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 00:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philgons.com/2007/12/mignes-patrologia-graeca-in-logos/#comment-6597</guid>
		<description>Phil, I linked to you and to one of the Patristics blogs I&#039;m familiar with to hopefully get the word out a little better.

Now we just need Loeb Classical Library - at least in the 200 BC - 200 AD range...

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil, I linked to you and to one of the Patristics blogs I&#8217;m familiar with to hopefully get the word out a little better.</p>
<p>Now we just need Loeb Classical Library &#8211; at least in the 200 BC &#8211; 200 AD range&#8230;</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
