Wallace vs. Ehrman on the Textual Reliability of the NT

Today and tomorrow Daniel Wallace will be debating Bart Ehrman on “The Textual Reliability of the New Testament.” The debate is part of the Greer-Heard Point-Counterpoint Forum, a ministry of New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary.

Here’s the announcement from DTS:

On April 4-5, 2008, Dr. Dan Wallace, professor of New Testament Studies at Dallas, will participate in a debate with Dr. Bart Ehrman, chair of the department of religious studies at University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, over the textual reliability of the New Testament.

For more information, please visit www.greer-heard.com.

Wallace vs. Ehrman

Let’s pray that God’s truth would prevail.

, , ,

2 Responses to Wallace vs. Ehrman on the Textual Reliability of the NT

  1. pamuk7 December 28, 2010 at 11:28 am #

    “Let’s pray that God’s truth would prevail.”

    Lolz, an obvious sign of someone who has already made up his mind, based on biased preconceived emotions. Bart was once like that, until he came to know the truth hurts, which is: the Bible is not historically reliable.

  2. Peter G. July 18, 2011 at 9:34 am #

    For those interested, Wallace and Ehrman are set to debate again this October at Southern Methodist University. You can find out more at http://www.smudebate.com.

Leave a Reply