
While the tide is slowly turning, many modern scholars and pastors still reject what the late Michael S. Heiser popularized as the divine council worldview (DCW). But it’s not entirely clear to me which claims they find controversial or difficult to accept, since it’s often accepted or rejected wholesale as a set of interconnected ideas. I suspect it’s mostly due to lack of familiarity, misunderstanding, or tribal loyalties—or perhaps a case of throwing out the baby with the bathwater (I don’t love his chapter on free will, either). I’d love to better understand the exegetical and theological objections, and I’m hoping to draw some of them out.
In this article, I aim to lay out what I believe are the major claims of the DCW in an attempt to demonstrate that they (a) aren’t built on fringe interpretations of one or two obscure, debated texts and (b) don’t require embracing 1 Enoch or borrowing ideas from religious texts of the ancient Near East. I attempt to demonstrate that the DCW is thoroughly biblical.
Table of Contents
- 1. Yahweh, the uncreated and eternal triune creator, created other spirit beings who are properly called elohim, gods, or sons of God, which the broader canon identifies as angels.
- 2. These other gods participate with Yahweh in a heavenly council or assembly.
- 3. These heavenly beings play ruling roles over the nations.
- 4. These heavenly ruling beings are the gods of the nations = “demons”
- 5. Some of these heavenly beings rebelled—on multiple occasions.
- 6. Yahweh brings judgment on these wicked heavenly rulers.
- 7. Jesus came to bring Yahweh’s judgment on the spiritual forces of darkness and to claim his rightful place as heir of the throne.
- 8. The Spirit’s arrival at Pentecost marked the reversal of Babel and Yahweh’s reclamation of the nations.
- Conclusion